The approximate number of sentences islike for introduction. Find the best way to present your arguments. This type of essay would require a solid position, argumentation, and loads of facts. Therefore, a sample of the essay on this topic is presented here. The weapon of choice, euthanasia essay outline. In recent years, physician-assisted suicide has become the focus of great moral, political, and constitutional controversy in the United States. Although there are both sides of the debate on euthanasia a common agreement between the euthanasia essay outline groups is that it involves killing a patient.
Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Example
Special offer! Promo code: SAVE One of the greatest debates surrounding the topic of euthanasia revolves around its legalization. The legality of euthanasia has spurred euthanasia essay outline lot of debate due to the rise in cases of terminal illnesses such as cancer. There are people who support legalization of the procedure while there are others who strongly condemn it, terming it as intentional killing, euthanasia essay outline. Despite the argument put across by both sides, euthanasia is legally and morally wrong since it disregards the value of human life. Euthanasia should be condemned by all means necessary since it involves ending the life of a human being. Any country that upholds Christian or any other religious values should make laws that prohibit the practice.
In the same breadth, by allowing euthanasia, euthanasia essay outline, medical practitioners are given too much power to kill. Doctors are given the right to kill in what is commonly referred to as playing God, euthanasia essay outline. In the modern days, doctors are taking self-centered interests in making money or making things go their way. In Netherlands for example, many patients die every year due to physician-assisted killing whether it was without consent or not Reichlin, Euthanasia also destroys the normal doctor-patient relationship.
Frequently, a patient seeks a doctor because euthanasia essay outline or she knows that the doctor will do anything to save their life. However, if euthanasia is legalized, then patients may distrust the doctors. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath that makes it clear that they should treat their patients euthanasia essay outline the best of their ability, alleviate pain, and protect life. Legalizing mercy killing would go against the very oath through which doctors are sworn in. Further, euthanasia goes against the sanctity of human life. Moral ethics dictate that nobody should intentionally terminate the life of another person or their own life Goligher et al.
The foundation that the worth of the human person is both intrinsic and incalculable Goligher et al. In line with this foundation, human life should only be lost naturally but euthanasia essay outline intentionally, euthanasia essay outline. In essence, no matter the side of the debate one is, all can agree to the fact that euthanasia is a form of murder. Both parties to the debate may present arguments but what remains clear is that life will be lost. In the past, some terminally ill patients had survived even when medical reports indicated that they would not survive. Therefore, it would be selfish and wrong to end the life of a patient based on a medical report.
Individuals who are for mercy killing agree that sometimes miracles do happen where terminally ill patients survive Attell, Therefore, every patient no matter their level of pain should be given a chance to live or die in peace. Sometimes a patient may consent to mercy killing due to the amount of pain that they are going through. However, in the recent past, there have been technological advancements that tend to help to ease pain. As a result, killing a patient on the basis of ending their pain is slowly becoming a thing of the past. No medical practitioner should play God by deciding who lives and who dies no matter the level of consent given.
Individuals who are in a coma and had not indicated whether they wish to die or not, have the right to keep on going with their lives until they die naturally. That should be left unto God to decide. Most of the times, patients who claim to be euthanized do so out of pain, suffering, and medical costs, euthanasia essay outline. Here, they may feel as if they are a burden to their relatives and therefore desire to die with an aim of cutting down on the expenses. However, the truth is every person desires to see their relative up to the last point of their life. In case such a patient is taken through mercy killing, the relatives will live with a guilty conscious wondering whether their loved one could have survived if they were not given the lethal injection.
By all means possible, the life of a euthanasia essay outline should be preserved and no person should decide when it ends. The existence of palliative care and technological advancements in the medical industry proves that euthanasia is wrong. Although there are both sides of the debate on the practice, a common agreement between the two groups is that it involves killing a patient. In euthanasia essay outline instances, doctors decide to play God and administer a lethal injection that ends the life of a patient. Although a patient may decide to receive the lethal dose, they do so out of pain and suffering, and sometimes out of concern for the medical costs involved in their care.
No matter the argument put across by any group, euthanasia remains what it is: killing an innocent patient. It is euthanasia essay outline wrong, euthanasia essay outline. Attell, B, euthanasia essay outline. Changing attitudes toward euthanasia and suicide for terminally ill persons, to an age-period-cohort analysis, euthanasia essay outline. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying Euthanasia essay outline, E. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the intensive care unit: A dialogue on core ethical issues, euthanasia essay outline. Crit Care Med. Saul, H. Sulmasy, D. Non-faith-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
The Linacre Quarterly, 83 3 Thesis: Despite the argument put across by both sides of the debate, euthanasia is legally and morally wrong since it disregards the value of human life. In summary, the existence of palliative care and technological advancements in the medical industry proves that euthanasia is euthanasia essay outline. Although there are both sides of the debate on euthanasia a common agreement between the two groups is that it involves killing a patient. com is a leading academic writing service that is dedicated to providing extra support and help to students all over the world. Through our website, students can request for help in a diverse range of subjects and disciplines.
We understand that studies are the euthanasia essay outline of success; yet they can be quite a challenge without extra help. Ours, therefore, is to pick up where your lecturers stop by providing you with a reliable process for meeting your academic needs. Do My Essay! Do not waste time. Get a complete paper today. Order essays, euthanasia essay outline, research papers, term papers, book reviews, assignments, dissertation, thesis Read more…, euthanasia essay outline. Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Sample Published by gudwriter on May 27, May 27, No Bullshit!!
Get A Custom Essay Special offer! Categories: Free Essays and Research Papers. Tags: Examples of Argumentative Essays Free Euthanasia Essays. gudwriter Gudwriter. Related Posts Free Essays and Research Papers Euthanasia essay outline Sex Marriage Argumentative Essay, with Outline Do My Essay! Free Essays and Research Papers A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius Summary Do My Essay! Free Essays and Research Papers Organizational Culture Essay Do My Essay!
essay importance of education
The main body for an argumentative essay should consist of two parts, one for each point of view. Once you express your point of view in the introduction, then it would be logical to start the main body from it. Like, f. Begin with the weakest argument and move up to the most solid one you have. Provide the reader with some positive examples, including personal stories, if they fit in, try to find shreds of evidence of euthanasia practice in your country. Once you finish with the arguments for the first part, go on representing the opposite point of view. List a couple of statements against Euthanasia. In conclusion, you sum up all the ideas highlighted in your essay, without adding new ones. Here you should also express your point of view and paraphrase the thesis you used in the introduction.
An outline is a brief sketch of your essay. If you need to write it, select the main ideas of your work and write them down in a couple of sentences. I highlight some statements for and against the use of Euthanasia and support them with top examples. In conclusion, I explain my personal position on this question. This topic is pretty vast. It can be both good and bad for you. Due to the variety of topics within the issue of Euthanasia, it might be easy to find something you are genuinely interested in. On the other hand, there are dozens of various materials, thousands of articles, and billions of opinions you should consider before writing. Sometimes it might be difficult for you to get a full picture.
The legality of euthanasia has spurred a lot of debate due to the rise in cases of terminal illnesses such as cancer. There are people who support legalization of the procedure while there are others who strongly condemn it, terming it as intentional killing. Despite the argument put across by both sides, euthanasia is legally and morally wrong since it disregards the value of human life. Euthanasia should be condemned by all means necessary since it involves ending the life of a human being. Any country that upholds Christian or any other religious values should make laws that prohibit the practice.
In the same breadth, by allowing euthanasia, medical practitioners are given too much power to kill. Doctors are given the right to kill in what is commonly referred to as playing God. In the modern days, doctors are taking self-centered interests in making money or making things go their way. In Netherlands for example, many patients die every year due to physician-assisted killing whether it was without consent or not Reichlin, Euthanasia also destroys the normal doctor-patient relationship. Frequently, a patient seeks a doctor because he or she knows that the doctor will do anything to save their life.
However, if euthanasia is legalized, then patients may distrust the doctors. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath that makes it clear that they should treat their patients to the best of their ability, alleviate pain, and protect life. Legalizing mercy killing would go against the very oath through which doctors are sworn in. Further, euthanasia goes against the sanctity of human life. Moral ethics dictate that nobody should intentionally terminate the life of another person or their own life Goligher et al. The foundation that the worth of the human person is both intrinsic and incalculable Goligher et al. In line with this foundation, human life should only be lost naturally but not intentionally.
In essence, no matter the side of the debate one is, all can agree to the fact that euthanasia is a form of murder. Both parties to the debate may present arguments but what remains clear is that life will be lost. In the past, some terminally ill patients had survived even when medical reports indicated that they would not survive. Therefore, it would be selfish and wrong to end the life of a patient based on a medical report. Individuals who are for mercy killing agree that sometimes miracles do happen where terminally ill patients survive Attell, Therefore, every patient no matter their level of pain should be given a chance to live or die in peace.
Most of them have to be accorded hour care by their family members, and this affects the ability of their family members to engage in economic undertakings Goel A high proportion of terminally ill patients cannot feed, bathe, and clothe themselves, implying that such chores have to be done by other people Goel Some patients feel that they should not subject their family members to such misery, and therefore should be given a choice to choose the time of their death when such severe health complications arise. They should be allowed the opportunity to relieve their families of the burden that comes with caring for them, knowing very well that they have no chance at recovering and living normal life again. In this light, euthanasia gives relatives of a terminally ill patient the choice to allow their suffering family member to die a peaceful and painless death Swarte 2.
Through the procedure, family members will not watch as their loved suffers in agony, and this will save them the psychological torture that results from such experiences. In conclusion thus, euthanasia is a moral medical procedure that should be legalized by all states. It helps save terminally ill patients from endless suffering. It also gives the patients a chance to choose their time of death, and die with dignity. Family members of terminally ill patients are as well able to save finances that would have otherwise been used for medical expenses. The procedure should therefore be legal owing to its benefits as discussed above.
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. Goel, Vaibhav. Swarte, Nikkie B. Thesis: Euthanasia helps save terminally ill patients from prolonged agony and suffering. The practice has received massive criticism over its morality, but why should it be upheld. Euthanasia is a morally acceptable practice. It has numerous benefits for terminally ill patients and their families. Some of its benefits entail alleviating pain and suffering on terminally ill patients and giving patients a choice to choose how and when to die. com is a leading academic writing service that is dedicated to providing extra support and help to students all over the world.
Through our website, students can request for help in a diverse range of subjects and disciplines. We understand that studies are the foundation of success; yet they can be quite a challenge without extra help. Ours, therefore, is to pick up where your lecturers stop by providing you with a reliable process for meeting your academic needs. Do My Essay!
No comments:
Post a Comment